Side-by-side comparison

CeraVe PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion vs Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35

Both are moisturisers. They share a 77% active-ingredient overlap, so the real decision is about price, texture and the supporting ingredients. Here's the side-by-side.

77%Active overlap
CeraVe
MoisturiserMid-rangeEvening only
Damaged BarrierDrynessOiliness

Lightweight nighttime moisturiser with niacinamide and ceramides. Less heavy than the tub Moisturizing Cream, more barrier-focused than most lotions — excellent as a finishing layer over retinoids or acids.

Cetaphil
MoisturiserBudgetMorning only
Sun ProtectionDehydrationSensitivity

A lightweight daily moisturiser with built-in chemical SPF 35, niacinamide and hyaluronic acid. Convenient morning all-in-one for low-sun-exposure days; for deliberate sun exposure a dedicated sunscreen is still better.

The verdict

Which should you choose?

On price, the Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35 sits in the Budget tier versus Mid-range for the CeraVe — so it's the more budget-led pick if the overlap is what you're after. On how you'd use them, the CeraVe is flagged Evening only while the Cetaphil is flagged Morning only. The CeraVe leans toward Damaged Barrier, Dryness, Oiliness. The Cetaphil leans toward Dehydration, Sensitivity, Sun Protection.

The overlap

What they share

At 77% active overlap, these are the ingredients doing comparable work in both formulas:

The formulation

Ingredient stacks, side by side

CeraVe — top of the list

  • Purified Water~50–80%
  • Glycerin~5–25%
  • Caprylic/Capri…~3–10%
  • Niacinamide~2–6%
  • Cetearyl Alcohol~1.5–4%
  • Ceramide NP~1–2%
  • Sodium Hyaluro…~1–2%
  • Cholesterol~1–2%

Cetaphil — top of the list

  • Aqua~50–80%
  • Homosalate~5–25%
  • Octisalate~3–10%
  • Avobenzone~2–6%
  • Glycerin~1.5–4%

● marks ingredients that appear near the top of both lists. Percentages are positional estimates from INCI order, not disclosed doses.

At a glance

The specs

CeraVeCetaphil
CategoryMoisturiserMoisturiser
Price tierMid-rangeBudget
Best forDamaged Barrier, Dryness, OilinessSun Protection, Dehydration, Sensitivity
Usage notesEvening onlyMorning only
Active overlap77% — Hyaluronic Acid, Niacinamide
Questions

Common questions

Is the CeraVe PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion or the Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35 better?
Neither is universally better — they share 77% active-ingredient overlap, so for the actives that drive results they're close. The Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35 is the more budget-friendly option, while the other may differ on texture, finish and supporting ingredients. Pick based on your skin's priorities rather than a single 'winner'.
What's the difference between the CeraVe PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion and the Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35?
Both are moisturisers that share Hyaluronic Acid, Niacinamide. Where they differ: they sit in different price tiers (Mid-range vs Budget); the CeraVe is Evening only; the Cetaphil is Morning only; the CeraVe targets Damaged Barrier, Dryness; the Cetaphil targets Dehydration, Sensitivity.
Are the CeraVe PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion and Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35 dupes for each other?
They share 77% active-ingredient overlap based on published INCI lists, so one can stand in for the other on the actives that matter — chiefly Hyaluronic Acid, Niacinamide. A dupe matches the hero actives, not the full sensory experience, so expect differences in texture, fragrance and exact concentrations.
Can I use the CeraVe PM Facial Moisturizing Lotion and Cetaphil Daily Facial Moisturizer SPF 35 together?
They both fill the moisturiser slot in a routine, so you'd normally pick one rather than layer both. If you want to use both, treat one as your daytime option and the other for evening, and patch-test when introducing anything new.
Keep comparing

Related comparisons

Want a deeper, personalised read? Drop both products into the live comparison tool for an ingredient-by-ingredient breakdown tuned to your skin profile.

Compare these yourself →